|
Also, for the one I bought for the magazine, when the recorder first came out, I paid nearly twice what I paid for this one. I had a very positive experience with this recorder as editor of a magazine and used it for interviews, conferences and large meetings -- it has sensitivity settings for each environment, and two options for elevating it for best reception. One other thing: this LOOKS like serious, professional equipment; that may seem trivial, but when you plunk this thing down in front of a source you're interviewing, it does tend to make a statement, much the same as when you haul out a top-end camera instead of some point-and-shoot toy. Now I'm retired but doing a lot of work in Egyptian archeological sites, and bought this recently for my own use. It's larger than most such recorders, especially with the mike windguard attached, but for the serious user who needs to be sure of the recording quality, it's excellent. I'm taking it with me next week to Egypt, where I need to tape notes to myself to transcribe later and also isolate background noise in busy sites like temples and tombs. All in all, very much worth the money.
This is a Sony. Need I say any more. You get what you pay for and this is a nice micro-recorder at a nice price.
It just stopped working.which is a shame because this recorder was convenient and came with that spongy thing around the mic which cut down on wind noise.This is about the third (and last) Sony I'm going to try. It soon after stopped playing, as well.
You figure Sony has to produce a good one; after all, it's Sony. Well, not necessarily.
I honestly don't know what to think of microcassette recorders. But alas, it lasted for only about three months, then it stopped recording.
I bought one of these because I do occasional taped interviews. It seemed to work well and always got the attention of the people I interviewed.
No one abused it, dropped it or subjected it to any jolts. I think I'll try Olympus next.
I thought this would be the end-all, be-all solution to my microcassette needs, which include field recordings, music ideas, dictation and lecture. It's not.I tried three models, thinking each time it was just a bad model, but each one had an enourmous amount of flutter on playback, as if everything recorded was being twanged with a whammy bar. Too large and bulky for standard dictation needs as well, you can do better for dication with a smaller one.
Best micro recorder I've ever had. And I've one througt a number of them with all the dictating I do in a day. This is a well made machine, with a good mic.
|
